Coming soon!

We're taking a short break while we put the finishing touches on a fresh, new way of delivering Nebraska athletics content and stories. Visit soon to experience the next evolution of Huskers sports coverage.
Five Thoughts on Nick Gates' NFL Decision
Photo Credit: Aaron Babcock

Hot Reads: Huskers Will Have to Win Some Battles Up Front

October 05, 2017

Nebraska’s offensive line was going the wrong way early in 2017. The Huskers gave up one sack to Arkansas State in the opener, but shut out Red Wolves’ defensive end Ja’Von Rolland-Jones, one of the nation’s best pass rushers. (Rolland-Jones got his first two sacks of the season in last night’s win over Georgia Southern.)

A week later, the Huskers allowed two sacks to Oregon’s aggressive 3-4. The Ducks are currently tied for fourth nationally at four sacks per game. Then came the one that still doesn’t make much sense – allowing three sacks to Northern Illinois. That’s still a third of the Huskies’ season total. Somehow the Huskers held up for the most part against a dynamic Oregon rush on the road, but couldn’t handle the Huskies’ rush at home. It still doesn't add up.

Nothing a game against Rutgers can’t fix, however. Nebraska allowed zero sacks there, then two last week to Illinois. Overall, Nebraska’s a little bit better than average at not allowing sacks, ranking 45th nationally at 1.6 per game.

But here comes Wisconsin. Like Oregon, the Badgers are averaging four per game. Last week against Northwestern, Wisconsin had eight. And this, from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, outlines how it “might could” (to borrow a Mike Riley-ism) get dicey for Nebraska on Saturday:


[Northwestern QB Clayton] Thorson was sacked twice on first down, twice on second down and four times on third down.

UW rushed just four men on six of the sacks, five men on one sack and six on one sack. 

“It was really just a four-man rush and those guys were just winning,” said inside linebacker Chris Orr, who recorded the sack with six rushers. “I think we have some exotic pressures in our hip pocket. And we haven’t shown any of the new stuff we have. Guys are just winning. They were just flat-out winning.”


I normally don’t like to spend this much time talking about sacks. Just as it’s possible for a baseball team to be efficient offensively without a ton of home runs, a pass rush can be getting the job done without high sack totals, so whatever total Wisconsin ends up with on Saturday could be somewhat incidental. If the Huskers give up three or four sacks but control the rush on the majority of the other passing attempts, they might be fine.

I noted yesterday in a game preview, that the Badgers’ tackles for loss average is actually greater in losses than in wins. The same isn’t quite true for sacks, but it’s about even. In 25 wins under Paul Chryst Wisconsin has averaged 2.56 sacks compared to 2.33 in six losses. Nebraska’s just going to have to live with some losses on Saturday.

But what I’m confident can’t happen is outlined by Orr above. There were two parts of his quote that stood out. One, “It was really just a four-man rush and those guys were just winning.” The Huskers’ offensive linemen are going to have to win perhaps more than their fair share of those battles up front.

If they can, then they’ll need to be ready for part two from Orr: “. . . we haven’t shown any of the new stuff we have.” If that’s accurate, then Nebraska probably isn’t going to be able to game plan its way to better protection, either. At least not entirely. At some point the Huskers are going to have to “just flat-out win” some matches of its own again.

Football games are usually decided that way, but it often seems to come down to that against Wisconsin.

The Grab Bag

Today's Song of Today

  • Never miss the latest news from Hail Varsity!

    Join our free email list by signing up below.